08-Nov-2008 01:52 AM
08-Nov-2008 12:29 PM
05-Feb-2009
12:59 AM
- last edited on
05-Feb-2009
11:41 AM
by
kenken
18-Mar-2009 08:51 AM
I have seen all the excuses here. Basically the manufacturers are say a "mobile" phone isn't fit for purpose.
Lame excuses such as sweat in your pocket or a drop of rain. There is moister in the Atmophere everywhere. If so called liquid damage is the cause then every peice of electronic eqqipment I have in my house would fail.
I think Manufacturers have a list of excuses. Phones4u have their own repair centre, owned by them and it's the same old story. Either the phones are made for normal mobile usage or they are not. Simple as that. If it can't be kept in a pocket or stand a drop of rain once in a while then its not fit for the purpose it was made for. Cars have engine management systems , very complicated and very exspensive and you dont see them failing all over the show withthe excuse its liquid damage.
22-Mar-2009 01:36 PM
Whenever anyone is dissatisfied with someone's unjust decision, he is always welcome by judiciary. And this fits to any and everybody.
Even Nokia may takes solace to courts.
So friends, stop whining and, if you think Nokia is treating you very unfairly (should ignore minor stuff), go to judicial system of the country.
13-Apr-2009 12:12 PM
How's about we throw this whole "Water Damage" thing in the air and say according to this, Nokia's "Water Damage" policy isn't wort the paper it's written on with regards to using the handset in the rain.
Look for the N73 having a shower Nokia test center video.
13-Apr-2009 05:10 PM
Personally I wonder how long this thread can go on !
13-Apr-2009 09:53 PM
bandofbrothers wrote:Personally I wonder how long this thread can go on !
Maybe a good downpour will finish it off...
15-Apr-2009 01:03 PM
You've got to laugh at the location of some of the "immersion" indicators on their phones. My N79 has one the size of a pinhead on the bottom left under the * key. Forget "immersion", that thing's going to be set off if a depressive ant weeps on it.
Anyway, I think it goes without saying that you shouldn't take this sort of **bleep**. Take the NCP or the company that sold you the handset to the small claims court and recover the cost of replacing or repairing, then forward the details on to Nokia. Eventually they'll get the message. In my experience some NCPs are absolute cowboys and will come up any sort of nonsense to justify voiding the warranty. (I sent my own sob story about this to Nokia and they didn't give me even one word of response.) I'm dreading taking my N79 in for something as simple as getting the XpressOn covers to fit properly, they'll probably try to blame that on user damage.
15-Apr-2009 01:11 PM
15-Apr-2009 01:13 PM
28-Apr-2009 02:24 AM
29-Jun-2009 08:25 PM
06-Feb-2010 09:13 AM
similar issue here...
sweaty hands, in and out of air-con office, humidity.... these are real life activities....
"water damaged" beyond repair... agree its a good way to tell you time to get a new phone cos we need to make more and sell more...
i have a 5800 with the same problem.. 2 months before the warranty is about to expire...
i suggest we start a "natural" corrosion thread for each and every model that has "water damage".... i think there will be surprising statistics.. (but probably not surprising for Nokia)..
cheers..
(location: Singapore)
14-Feb-2010 12:11 PM
Hi All !
I have the same problem with NOKIA 5530 in Estonia ( small country near Finland)
Outside temp is - 20 C, inside + 20
In one month a new phone is dead and the Nokia dealer reaction is the same :
Humidity indicator is "red" - warranty is not valid any more !
Can you imagine this **bleep**?
How can I use it in Finland or Russia for instance where the outside temp might be - 40C ?!
That means they only sell as INDOOR handsets!?
I have used Samsung for last 5 years and now its a time to be back to that brand again.
I will never ever buy or recommend Nokia to any of my friends
The problems might occur in every handsets but I mostly hate the attitude of Nokia - there is no any possibility to discuss or to have feedback. Just only a feeling that we are paying own money to get a headache.
14-Feb-2010 12:19 PM
By the way - it is a great opportunity for Nokia R&D and marketing team ! Let's develop special anti-humidity box ( as for cigars) for Nokia handsets and let's make a new 100 ultra-sophisticated applications for it's control via bluetooth ! You can increase your sales up to the roof ! This brilliant idea is for sale !
14-Feb-2010 12:33 PM
As you see this discussion lasts from 2008 ( at least ) . I dont think that Nokia R&D has no idea how to eliminate this problem. They just dont want to do that since it is a permanent money - machine: first you pay for the handset, after few months warranty is not valid - you have to pay again for repair ! Quick and dirty.......and absolutely legal !
18-Feb-2010 06:29 AM
i couldnt be bothered reading the whole discussion.
i just saw the first one and it said water damage.
i have repaired many phones that have been water damaged.
i use metholated spirits. it does the job 70% of the time.
and it has worked with most of the phones i have fixed. thats one solution u can use ![]()
other wise buy a new phone lol
30-Mar-2011 05:37 PM
my boy has a 5800d , he has had it for 6months from carphonewharehouse and has been told the same thing, he even still had the cellophane cover on the face it was looked after that well.
i think this is some sort of con by nokia to cover up their design faults
26-Oct-2011 08:07 AM - last edited on 26-Oct-2011 08:14 AM
Aaaagh - I have just become aware of all this - too late, as I'm now getting the same treatment from Nokia, too!!
My $750 Nokia E7 has just failed after 6 months (and no fluids damage of any kind) and yet Nokia are now giving me that excuse and saying the warranty is void. Like hell!
After me kicking up a big fuss, their service centre manager has said they will refer the phone to a 3rd party, whose views they will act on. In other words, if the "3rd party" says it has fluids damage then they won't honour the warranty. Hmmm - let's see what happens. I'm very concerned given the attitude to date and after reading the various threads on the net (this is not the only one).
Furthermore, the same Nokia service centre did something similar with my wife's Nokia E63 a few months ago, in that case denying her warranty claim because they said the phone had been dropped. Except that it hadn't.
But they make the bald assertion and you're left having to take them to a disputes tribunal. They know most people will not go to that trouble. My wife won't either but she's really annoyed that the phone failed so soon and that she wasted all that time taking it in plus they in effect call her a cheat (for claiming warranty). So now she's just waiting for the new iphone and will buy that as soon as it comes out. I can't see her ever going back to Nokiain this lifetime
Will let you know if Nokia do the right thing eventually on my E7.